It is a policy for the French pragmatically

A majority which is torn, disturbing surveys: is it wise to continue the offensive in the field of security

It must of course continue. The President of the Republic meets a high expectation of the French and in a time where many of them have been shocked by the events of Grenoble and Saint-Aignan. This policy is strictly faithful to the project of the candidate Sarkozy and fits naturally into strict compliance with the laws of the Republic. And it is in phase with the French right as well as left, even if it offends a bien-pensant microcosm disconnected from realities on the ground. I am shocked by intemperate polemics, indeed extremely minority within our political family. How can we be surprised that applying the law of the Republic

Nicolas Sarkozy recalled the line: speech of Grenoble, "neither more nor less." You feel not referred

Absolutely not. It is for parliamentarians to feed the debate. And I'm totally in the speech of Grenoble, which is for me a roadmap to take. It will be the source of a new political phase of the quinquennium, a winback phase which will be Nicolas Sarkozy to re-election in 2012.

Does your text on the criminal responsibility of the parents of juvenile offenders still has a future

In 1980, there were 70,000 minor offenders, they are 230,000 today. However legal tools dating back to 1945 are more suitable. We will of course take account of the comments. But most of this text is a prevention device to allow prosecutors to issue orders of probation minors recidivist offenders. It is a way to establish a contract between families and society. The parents could not be condemned for acts committed by their children. In my text, they could be made responsible for the non-application of the probation order. It is not automatic and, of course, subject to the discretion of a judge. I am surprised some opponents sometimes intemperate remarks, because today there are similar provisions, like section 227-17 of the Penal Code, which punishes the breach of parental authority up to two years in prison. In our society, it must rehabilitate certain values such as discipline, parental authority.

Should we punish defaulters on security as mayors proposed Estrosi

He was right to denounce the lack of certain elected officials. I think about the faults of the Mayor of Grenoble, the inconsistencies of Martine Aubry. Or General Councils who have refused to establish parental responsibility contracts. It is a mistake and they are taking a heavy responsibility. The sanction will come anyway from the voters.

Should we relax the rules on forfeiture of nationality

I support the enlargement of the forfeiture of citizenship to all those that would affect the lives of police officers and gendarmes. And I support that suggested the Minister of the Interior to extend this possibility to the de facto polygamy.

Don't you be afraid that it benefits mainly to the FN

Don't have a policy of left or right wing by asking who it benefits. It is a policy for the French, pragmatically. In any event, the debate does not arise with Marine Le Pen. It arises with Martine Aubry. Which between Martine Aubry and Nicolas Sarkozy can best ensure the security of the French

Is it coherent to focus on security and reduce police personnel

Today, there are police 3,000 more than in 2001, which must be add 9.800 Assistant Security. One cannot step permanently seek additional means and recruit officials indefinitely. Can do better with a stable workforce and refocusing the police on their core business. What is is in a position to transfer prisoners to write a proxy

Is the current security offensive not an admission of failure

Since 2002 is extremely positive. We won success, overall, it's going better, but we have not won the war.