The layoff will immediately as a Conservatory

Happy new year! "When he enters the Office of Patrick Pelata this January 3, 2011 at 8 a.m., Bertrand Rochette began in model employee by his wishes to his boss. He returned from a week of vacation in New York family. It has been twenty-two years it engineer with Renault. That morning, he believes have an appointment with the Director-General to discuss the Organization of the draft. This is Odile Desforges, the Director of engineering and quality, who told him before the holidays that the number two of the Group wished to see it. "This is me not surprised." Patrick Pelata and me, we know for twenty years, we tutoyons. "And then he me in had already been a word at a seminar," he says.

But the maintenance soon takes an unexpected turn. Bertrand Rochette ignores that at the same time, the January 3, his superior, Michel Balthazard, is summoned by Jean-Yves Coudriou, Senior Director, and Matthew Tenenbaum, Deputy Director of the electric car program, is received by the legal Director, Christian Husson. The engineer learns, "amazed", that he and his colleagues are suspected by the direction of having sold abroad and strategic information for the company. "Patrick Pelata told me about relations abroad, he asked me if I had given documents to Michel Balthazard, says Bertrand Rochette, obviously still moved." During the interview, he also refers to China. I answer that I have worked extensively with Daimler, recently, but not with China. "Today, the means described all the same scenario: the announcement of a"gross"negligence,"serious"facts, the more or less pressure to"work"." ". We know what you did. "Your accomplices are already passed to confess, you'd better tell the truth," have thus just Christian Husson in a Matthew "stunned" Tenenbaum, according to his lawyer. The three men will have half an hour, then, accompanied by two members of the security, to retrieve a few cases. The layoff will immediately "as a Conservatory.

Therefore, all goes very quickly. The next evening, the press agency France had wind of the case and publishes the first dispatch. Under pressure, the direction of the communication confirms the layoff. Internal sources cite charges of industrial espionage on the electric car, a flagship project. On 5 January, the Minister of industry, Eric Besson, was the first to speak of "economic war". "". "If the facts alleged are true, this would be a grave and serious matter," he added. The press quickly points "Chinese track", that neither the company nor the Government will confirm. For its part, Renault complaint against X on 13 January for constituent facts "industrial espionage, bribery, breach of trust, flight and concealment, committed in organized band", and dismisses three frames for gross negligence. They deny any block. They say all "fall of naked" and "living a nightmare". In the entourage of the automobile manufacturer, is rather the psychology to explain their possible attitudes of "denial".

Anonymous information

Going back. It started with an anonymous information. Therefore, the facts are presented in the letter of dismissal for gross negligence to three frames. Renault received an anonymous information involving you indirectly. 'This last mentioned the fact that you had seen the "bribes" ', writes Jean-Yves Coudriou letter to Matthew Tenenbaum. A Bertrand Rochette, which was not mentioned in the information, leader said: "it is clear from the investigations that you are also involved and that you have received money from foreign sources leading to belief, given your responsibilities in an area vital for the future of the company, that you gave in exchange of strategic information for the company.". But Renault does not specify the elements that led to this "belief".

Yet, it took barely four months for the automaker for its investigation. In August 2010, the Ethics Committee gives an inquiry two members of the security of Renault, Dominique Gevrey and Marc Tixador, former police officers. According to some sources, they would have quickly is a private investigator. But Renault does not confirm its existence, and relatives of the group play to muddying: "external people can have interest to inform Renault", "there are congenital offenders and criminals of opportunity, the occasional crime is not where the people are very careful". What ask questions on the existence of the detective, who, to conduct his investigation, reportedly received 50,000 euros, a paltry sum for this type of audit.

In any event, before Christmas, everything seems to loop. The device at foot of suspected employees stopped: the internal investigators have managed to

Happy new year! "When he enters the Office of Patrick Pelata this January 3, 2011 at 8 a.m., Bertrand Rochette began in model employee by his wishes to his boss. He returned from a week of vacation in New York family. It has been twenty-two years it engineer with Renault. That morning, he believes have an appointment with the Director-General to discuss the Organization of the draft. This is Odile Desforges, the Director of engineering and quality, who told him before the holidays that the number two of the Group wished to see it. "This is me not surprised." Patrick Pelata and me, we know for twenty years, we tutoyons. "And then he me in had already been a word at a seminar," he says.

But the maintenance soon takes an unexpected turn. Bertrand Rochette ignores that at the same time, the January 3, his superior, Michel Balthazard, is summoned by Jean-Yves Coudriou, Senior Director, and Matthew Tenenbaum, Deputy Director of the electric car program, is received by the legal Director, Christian Husson. The engineer learns, "amazed", that he and his colleagues are suspected by the direction of having sold abroad and strategic information for the company. "Patrick Pelata told me about relations abroad, he asked me if I had given documents to Michel Balthazard, says Bertrand Rochette, obviously still moved." During the interview, he also refers to China. I answer that I have worked extensively with Daimler, recently, but not with China. "Today, the means described all the same scenario: the announcement of a"gross"negligence,"serious"facts, the more or less pressure to"work"." ". We know what you did. "Your accomplices are already passed to confess, you'd better tell the truth," have thus just Christian Husson in a Matthew "stunned" Tenenbaum, according to his lawyer. The three men will have half an hour, then, accompanied by two members of the security, to retrieve a few cases. The layoff will immediately "as a Conservatory.

Therefore, all goes very quickly. The next evening, the press agency France had wind of the case and publishes the first dispatch. Under pressure, the direction of the communication confirms the layoff. Internal sources cite charges of industrial espionage on the electric car, a flagship project. On 5 January, the Minister of industry, Eric Besson, was the first to speak of "economic war". "". "If the facts alleged are true, this would be a grave and serious matter," he added. The press quickly points "Chinese track", that neither the company nor the Government will confirm. For its part, Renault complaint against X on 13 January for constituent facts "industrial espionage, bribery, breach of trust, flight and concealment, committed in organized band", and dismisses three frames for gross negligence. They deny any block. They say all "fall of naked" and "living a nightmare". In the entourage of the automobile manufacturer, is rather the psychology to explain their possible attitudes of "denial".

Anonymous information

Going back. It started with an anonymous information. Therefore, the facts are presented in the letter of dismissal for gross negligence to three frames. Renault received an anonymous information involving you indirectly. 'This last mentioned the fact that you had seen the "bribes" ', writes Jean-Yves Coudriou letter to Matthew Tenenbaum. A Bertrand Rochette, which was not mentioned in the information, leader said: "it is clear from the investigations that you are also involved and that you have received money from foreign sources leading to belief, given your responsibilities in an area vital for the future of the company, that you gave in exchange of strategic information for the company.". But Renault does not specify the elements that led to this "belief".

Yet, it took barely four months for the automaker for its investigation. In August 2010, the Ethics Committee gives an inquiry two members of the security of Renault, Dominique Gevrey and Marc Tixador, former police officers. According to some sources, they would have quickly is a private investigator. But Renault does not confirm its existence, and relatives of the group play to muddying: "external people can have interest to inform Renault", "there are congenital offenders and criminals of opportunity, the occasional crime is not where the people are very careful". What ask questions on the existence of the detective, who, to conduct his investigation, reportedly received 50,000 euros, a paltry sum for this type of audit.

In any event, before Christmas, everything seems to loop. The device at foot of suspected employees stopped: the internal investigators have managed to